Manage Learn to apply best practices and optimize your operations.

Are you being served with a single cloud provider?

If your company is brazen enough to standardize on Amazon Web Services, you better be ready to hold it accountable.

As a tech journalist who's covered enterprise IT for more than a decade, I've heard quite a few variations on the old "no one ever got fired for buying IBM" tech industry maxim. Over the years, IT managers have told me they dodged the pink slip by aligning their companies with EMC, VMware and Microsoft. So I wasn't that surprised when an enterprise IT manager recently told me, "no one ever got fired for going with AWS."

Entrusting Amazon Web Services (AWS) with all of your IT business seems a bit premature at this stage in the game, but I'll let that stand. It is, after all, the 800-pound gorilla in the cloud computing space. And if you're committed to a single cloud vendor, it's probably as good a choice as any.

Just because an organization standardizes on AWS, however, doesn't mean this 800-pound gorilla shouldn't be held accountable -- and kept on its toes.

Just because an organization standardizes on AWS, however, doesn't mean this 800-pound gorilla shouldn't be held accountable -- and kept on its toes.

One way is to lay the groundwork for a multi-cloud strategy.

Cedexis is the company behind the Radar Community, a free service that monitors major cloud and content delivery network providers including AWS, but also Joyent, Google Compute Engine, Microsoft Azure, Rackspace and IBM/SoftLayer, among others. Cedexis also offers the paid OpenMix load-balancing service that keys off Radar performance data so workloads can be balanced or moved across cloud regions, data centers and even between clouds -- depending on performance. Maintaining the flexibility to move a workload to a different cloud if needed sounds like a good idea, but something few do. OpenMix's primary competition comes from AWS Route 53, a DNS service that connects user requests to other resources … in AWS, said Rob Malnati, vice president of marketing and business development at Cedexis.

So much for managing risk.

I can understand that an organization would choose not to go down a multi-cloud route. It can be complicated, time consuming, expensive and error-prone. But that doesn't mean you should let your primary cloud provider off the hook. At the very least, cloud consumers need to monitor the performance of resources running in AWS, as well as the performance that consumers of those applications experience. In a perfect world, that data would feed into a common portal such that AWS resources can be managed side-by-side with workloads that are running (gasp!) on-premises.

Luckily, there's no shortage of companies that provide some level of cloud monitoring, including CopperEgg, NewRelic, Keynote, Site24x7 and CA Nimsoft, to name a few. The key is to pick one. Because no one ever got fired for knowing what the hell is going on.

Alex Barrett is editor in chief of Modern Infrastructure. Write to her at

Dig Deeper on Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) management

Join the conversation

1 comment

Send me notifications when other members comment.

Please create a username to comment.


There is a new kid on the block called Krystallize Technologies who provide a rather unique way of evaluating the true price/performance of your cloud or hosted environment. The CloudQoS tool rides along with the application to provide visibility into the level of performance being delivered by the underlying platform. No other tools let you see inside the environment in the same way. This is giving rise to a whole new discipline called Platform Performance Management with Krystallize leading the way.